Article Details
Geology, fluid inclusion characteristics and mineral resource estimation of the Güzelyayla porphyry Cu-Mo mineralization (NE Türkiye)

Indexed In
Volume 169 / 2022

Authors:
Mustafa Kemal REVAN, Deniz GÖÇ, Mustafa ÖZKAN, Cüneyt ŞEN, Rasim Taylan KARA, Mustafa TOKOĞLU, Semi HAMZAÇEBİ, Rıfat Cihan SEVİM, Fatih SEZEN, Celaleddin BAYRAKTAR, Ömer AKGÜL

Keywords:
Güzelyayla Mineralization, Porphyry Cu-Mo, U-Pb Zircon, Sediment Geochemistry, Geostatistics.

Abstract:

Magmatic processes that emerged with the evolution of the Neotethys ocean and associated lithospheric plates caused the formation of significant mineralization in the Tethys belt. The Eastern Pontides, which are located in the northeast of Turkey and are a part of the Tethys metallogenic belt,
are particularly rich in porphyry-type mineralization and represent an important region for Cu-Mo exploration. A large number of Cu, Pb and Zn anomalies have been determined in a large region including the Güzelyayla Cu-Mo field by stream sediment sampling. The Güzelyayla occurrence
is Cu-Mo mineralization associated with andesitic/basaltic volcanic rocks and intrusive dacites crosscutting these rocks. The Güzelyayla Cu-Mo mineralization developed in the stockwork and fault-controlled silicified zones. Homogenization temperature values vary between 324 °C and 420 °C (average 374 °C). Salinity values range between 2.2 and 18.6% NaCl (average 9.1% NaCl). A concentric alteration zoning surrounding the potassic alteration indicates a gradual change in the physicochemical properties of the solutions forming the mineralization. The Güzelyayla mineralization was formed in the Eocene (50.7 ± 1.0 million years) period in the Upper Cretaceous volcanic rocks in relation to post-collisional processes in the magmatic arc environment. Contrary to previous studies, estimation zone models were created and an estimated 54.2 million tons of extracted/potential mineral resource with an average grade of 0.20% Cu and 0.014% Mo (0.26% Cu equivalent grade) was made in the Güzelyayla field.

 

https://doi.org/10.19111/bulletinofmre.1074485

DOI:
10.19111/bulletinofmre.1074485



More Articles From Volume 169


Indexed In: Volume 169 / 2022
Volume 169
Recovery of Cu-Ce from copper slag by using flotation and chemical methods

Authors:
Bekir BAŞKURT, Mete Tayhan SERDENGEÇTİ, Kaan ÖZÇELİK, Hüseyin BAŞTÜRKCÜ

Keywords:
Copper Slag, Cu-Ce Recovery, Flotation, Leaching.

Indexed In: Volume 169 / 2022
Volume 169
Estimation of blast vibrations by numerical modelling and signal analysis

Authors:
Güzin Gülsev UYAR AKSOY, Cemalettin Okay AKSOY, Hasan Eray YAMAN

Keywords:
Blasting, vibration, seismic wave, numerical model, mining

Indexed In: Volume 169 / 2022
Volume 169
Uludağ extensional metamorphic core complex: preliminary field observations

Authors:
Gürol SEYİTOĞLU, Korhan ESAT

Keywords:
Uludağ Core Complex, North Anatolian Fault, Eskişehir Fault, Southern Marmara.